Act V: A Fitting End

Uncategorized 1 Comment »

After act four I really don’t think that anything could be expected but total death and destruction amongst most of the Hamlet characters. However to be completely honest I did not think that quite so much death would occur; I thought atleast a few more characters would make it out alive. After hearing of Laertes and Claudius’s plot at the end of act IV to kill Hamlet it was inevitable that something was going to go wrong, and thats just what happened.  I thought it was interesting that Hamlet and Laertes almost seemed to try and forgive eachother just before their duel, which ultimately would be each of their deaths.  It was exciting to read about the duel, going back and fourth and really not going Laertes way until he finally struck Hamlet with the poisonus tip of his sword. When Hamlet was hit I really was curious as to how exactly he was going ot get his revenge agains Claudius. Luckily he wasted no time in stabbing the King as well as forcing him to drink the poison, finally avenging his father’s death. I would like to know what exactly became of the kingdom of Denmark after the king died.  Hamlet wishes for Fortibras to be king of Denmark, and I am curious to see if that actually is what would have ended up happening. Shakespeare certainly saved much of the action for the last scene in the play, nothing was truly resovled until this point.  However once act V came, there was much resolution. I have mixed feelings about everyone dying in the end but I came to the conclusion that it was for the best.  Denmar was polluted with all these people and the whole kingdom is better off without them. This crazy last act truly was a fitting end for this play filled with madness.

The Expected Chaos

Uncategorized 1 Comment »

After the dramatic ending to act III, I had serious expecations for act IV to produce some madness.  Needless to say act iv did not dissapoint, madness was expected and madness is what was delivered by Shakespeare. Chaos is really the overall theme in act iv. I really enjoyed this act because in the first few acts Hamlet is acting crazy, and then one questions whether or not he is truly mad at the end of act three. However in act four about half the characters take on some form of insanity it seems, really making it interesting to read.

Perhaps the most delerious character in act iv is Ophelia, who is completely overwhelmed by her fathers murder. When she finds out that he has died she immediately begins to lose control and essentially turns into a blubbering fool, making little sense much of the time when she speaks. This just adds to the chaos of the already downward sprialing situation, again making it a joy to read. Ophelia simply cannot handle the agony of her fathers death and she ends up drowning in the river, marking the second death of that family in a short period of time.  Which leads to another character’s madness, who happens to be another family member, Laertes.

Laertes comes storming back from France when he hears of his fathers death and he comes armed and ready to slay Hamlet the moment he sees him. Laertes even comes with an entire entourage. Much to his dismay Hamlet has already been sent to England but just as soon as he has left, Hamlet will return for his ship was overtaken by pirates. This is great news for Laertes ashe wishes to channel his rage and madness into killing Hamlet. Which brings us to the next point, because of all this, even Claudius the King is beginning to go mad.  He begins plotting with Laertes on how to kill Hamlet, and they settle on trying to convince Hamlet to enter a duel with Laertes.  However Laertes will not be playing by the rules in this duel, he will play with a sharpened sword with poison on the end, to kill Hamlet. As mentioned before the act culminates with Ophelia dying and Laertes storming out, unable to handle all the madness. It seems a fitting ending for an entertaining act filled with chaos. I certainly expect more of the same from act v, and I am looking forward to seeing the resolution of the play.

In the Words of Claudius: Act III

Uncategorized 1 Comment »

My name is Claudius, King Claudius to be precise, and I am a tormented soul. If i could give this title of King back, back to its previous owner, I would do so in a heart beat. I have taken my brothers life, my brothers crown, and my brothers wife. It is even starting to look like i have taken my brother’s son’s sanity. I now believe if my sins are not forgiven soon, my sanity will be gone as well.  I have been beginning to break lately, feeling my nephew may know of my sins. I reached my threshold tonight when my nephew Hamlet put on a play depicting my murder of his father. How he knows of this I cannot say, for I haven’t the faintest idea how he found out.  What I do know is that I cannot take this tormenting and I must send Hamlet elsewhere.  I have decided to send him to England for I feel it will be best for everyone.  I simply cannot admit the murder of my brother, but with Hamlet around the guilt is simply too great. He must be gone. My wife cannot learn of my sins because she is all I have left. I even tried admitting my sins tonight through prayer, after seeing the brutally accurate depiction of my murder. However my prayer session simply did not work. I felt that my prayers were forced, not sincere. I wish to find a way to purge my sins, I know that I owe a great debt to my nephew, Hamlet, as well as the entire kingdom of Denmark. How and if I will repay them remains to be seen, I must first try and deal with this heavy burden of guilt.

Act Two Summary: Madness in Motion

Uncategorized 3 Comments »

As I said in my first post, act one was fairly interesting espeicially compared to the experiences I have become used to with Shakespeare. I had expectations for act two to begin advancing the plot, and that is just what happened.  At the end of act one it was was a little unclear what Hamlet was going to be doing, however it was clear that acting crazy was certainly going to be involved. Act two opens with Polonius talking with one of his servants, telling him to essentially spy on his son Laertes in France. Shortly after this conversation Polonius’s daughter, Ophelia, enters his room.  She is very distraught and tells her father how Hamlet grabbed her arm and simply stared at her and sighed.  Ophelia was very upset by this which in turn makes her father upset, believing that his daughter is the cause of Hamlet’s craziness. Polonius feels that he must at once go to Claudius the King and tell him what he thinks of Hamlet’s situation.

Scene two has several different subplots going on throughout including one situation with Fortinbras and the King of Norway. Fortinbras originally was attempting to wage war on Denmark, but at the request of the Norwegian King, withdrew this attempt. He instead wished to go to war against the Poles, and asks Claudius for passage through Denmark in order to attack Poland. The king then speaks with Polonius, who tells him how in love he believes Hamlet is with Ophelia. Polonius attempts to have Ophelia read some letters from Hamlet, but she simply is too overwhelmed and he must read them instead.

Meanwhile the Queen has sent for Hamlet’s friends, Rosencratz and Guildenstern, to come visit Hamlet. She believes that they may be able to bring back Hamlet to some state of sanity. After talking with his friends Hamlet lets on that he can be sane when he wishes, and he has some sort of master plan. The friends see some acters arrive at the castle and they are welcomed with a speech. After hearing a player (or actor) give a speech Hamlet is very touched and disturbed by it and goes to his room alone, cursing situation very loudly. It is in his room that Hamlet decides he will force the king to watch a play closely depicting the murder of his father, hoping to evoke heavy guilt in Claudius for what he has done.

Hamlet: More Interesting Than the Past

Uncategorized 1 Comment »

I have called Shakespearean plays a lot of things, however intriguing is not usually one of the adjectives i use to describe them. I most often times find myself stumbling through the old english that Shakespeare writes in, really missing the overall point or plot of the play.  Fortunately this has not been my experiences with Hamlet thus far.

I really do find this play intriguing and I can not put my finger on exactly why, but it is different than the other plays I have read. Perhaps it is because I am a year older than the last time I read Shakespeare, and I simply can understand it better. Or perhaps it is the intricate plot invloving three families and a mysterous murder. I think the play really became interesting when Hamlet talked to his father in ghost form for the first time. I half suspected his uncle to be the killer, but did not really believe it until Hamlet senior spoke the words.

I have a different feeling about this play, most likely because it is such a famous play and in my opinion the best Shakespeare work i have read so far in my high school career. I am anticipating some real drama between Hamlet and the new King, as some friction has already been introduced in the first act with the King playing clear favorites towards Laertes. I am interested to find out exactly why Hamlet’s uncle murdered his father; was it solely for his wife? Or was it for the power? I expect these questions to unfold in front of me during the course of the play along with some great action and plenty of suspense. Look forward to commenting after the next act. Long live Gary Snyder.

Gary Snyder Mock Poem (and comment sites)

Uncategorized 1 Comment »

We approached the ridge in time to see

the sun dip below the distant mountians.

The air immediatley shifted in feel,

from comfortable to instantly chilling.

Looking around during the last lingering seconds of daylight, we spot a glob

of dark brown hair.

Grizzly hair, crushed between the bark of a mamoth tree.

We realized it was time to move on-

the thick smell of danger hung all

around; on the thousands of leaves,

in the brush and the dry, cool, dirt.

This poem is based off the poem “Above Pate Valley”. It is a simple experience in nature, describing some of the sensations, but not in too great of depth. Snyder likes these snipets of nature, and so I tried to simulate that. Also, I put in an element of the power of nature, present in many of Snyder’s poems.

Commen sites:

http://oliviaegr5.edublogs.org/2009/03/25/the-beat-generation/#comment-10

http://www.americanpoems.com/add_comment.php

http://briegr5.edublogs.org/2009/03/11/langston-hughes/#comment-7

http://oliviaegr5.edublogs.org/2009/03/10/intro-to-ginsberg/#comments

 

 

Comment added 2009-03-29 17:01:09.

Gary Snyder Connection


I was wondering if anyone else finds a connection between Ginsberg poems like this one and Gary Snyder poetry. I have noticed that many of the scenes they paint are similar ones of people out on a trail in nature, enjoying that, among other things. I know that Ginsberg and Snyder were good friends and hiked in the mountains a great deal together so it seems resonable that their poetry would somehow be connected. Any thoughts on this anyone?

Danny from United States

This last comment was one I posted on a blog, however I do not know if it has been approved yet so i simply posted the comment here on my blog for everyone to see.

Thank you everyone for supporting Gary Snyder’s Fantasy Factory, it was a great blogging run, hope to see all you future bloggers down the road.

Final Impression

Uncategorized 2 Comments »

Overall I think this blog work was a success. It started off a little rocky, because I didn’t know the ins and outs of posting, but as time went on i became more comfortable. It really helped having the few days in the lab learing about the blog site. I would definately reccomend doing this blog project again, make sure to do a quick tutorial again in the beginning as well.

Even Gary Snyder Has Friends

Uncategorized 1 Comment »

I will be the first to admit that sometimes when I think of poets, I picture someone in an isolated room, working all by themselves writing poetry. However this is of course not true with poets, they in fact do have friends and Gary Snyder is no exception. Snyder is often classified as part of the Beat generation even if he begs to differ; it is his assosiation with this movement that lead him to meet one of his close friends who is also a poet, Allan Ginsberg.

     Ginsberg and Snyder met in the late 60′s and became good friends, influencing eachothers poetry and respecting eachother. In an article in the New York Times Ginsberg, demonstrating his respect towards Snyder, said

Ginsberg admitted being at a loss to offer practical help. “I wrote Gary Snyder, he’s the only one with a strong sense . . . to . . . find what need be done.”

More on this article can be found here.

Ginsberg clearly thought that Snyder was a strong person and knew what was important or ’what needed to be done’ in life. Many similarities can be found in these two poets writing. They both write about their personal experiences, speaking in a first person point of view, often about their adventures in nature. One of Ginsbergs poems, titled “136 Syllables at Rocky Dharma Center” is ever so similar to the poem i analyzed just a few posts down; Snyder’s Above “Pate Valley”.  In Ginsberg’s poem he writes,

Tail turned to red sunset on a juniper crown a lone magpie cawks.

Mad at Oryoki in the shrine-room — Thistles blossomed late afternoon.

Put on my shirt and took it off in the sun walking the path to lunch.

A dandelion seed floats above the marsh grass with the mosquitos

This is much like Snyder’s poems about simple experiences he has had in nature, describing what he sees and feels.  An entire text of this poem as well as many more Ginsberg poems can be found here, and the text for “Above Pate Valley” can be accessed just a few scrolls of your mouse down the page in a previous post. It is no suprise that Allen Ginsberg and Gary Snyder have similar writing topics and subject matter in their poetry, after all they did spend time hiking together in the mountains.  Spending so much time together in nature will inevitably have an effect on them, causing them to have similar experiences to write about as well as influence on one another. Ginsberg is just one among many of Snyder’s friends from the Beat generation, many of the poets having an influence on eachother.

Gary Snyder and Allen Ginsberg

Intertextuality: Snyder and his influences

Uncategorized 1 Comment »

There are a handful of writers who have essentially sculpted American Literature in the last century or so, among them are Ezra Pound and Walt Whitman.  It is inevitable that similarities between these famous writers and newer poets will pop up quite often; Gary Snyder is no exception. As those who have read any of my previous posts will know, Snyder is infatuated with nature as well as foreign culture, a sizeable portion of his poems deal with these topics.  This draws a striking comparison to some major influences of the past such as Walt Whitman as well as Ezra Pound.

There really is no secret when looking at the comparisons of Ezra Pound and Gary Snyder. They both simply loved the Asian culture. Snyder lived in Asia for a few years, spending a great deal of time in nature and hence combining these two aspects of life to write his poems (we will get to the nature part of his poetry shortly).  Ezra Pound is usually considered a literary giant, however if not for the influence of Asian culture and their writing style, Pound would not be who he is today. In an article on poets.org, (which is all about, you guessed it, poets) Pound is described by saying

 His own significant contributions to poetry begin with his promulgation of Imagism, a movement in poetry which derived its technique from classical Chinese and Japanese poetry

It is pretty apparent that his writing technique stemmed from some Asian countries writing styles, making them a great influence on him. Snyder is very similar in the way that the Asian culture impacted his writing, maybe not so much the writing styler as Pound, but just the overall experience of Asia gave Snyder things to write about. According to another article from “Jack Magezine”,

Gary’s interest in culture, the environment, language, and Zen Buddhism pretty much drove him

This is just too similar to Pound’s experience to ignore, these two poets are surely connected with their love for the Asian culture, making it the driving force behind their poetry. This entire article headlining Gary Snyder can be found here. This however is only half of what Snyder’s poetry is all about. The other half draws comparisons to Walt Whitman’s poetry, and his frequent allusions to nature.

Nature plays an essential role in Snyder’s poetry, the same can be said for Walt Whitman. There are many paralells and interexualities between Snyder’s and Whitman’s poems about nature. They each see nature as very powerful and it can even be argued to have special healing powers. In Whitman’s poem called “When I Heard the Learn’d Astronomer ” he writes,

How soon unaccountable I became tired and sick,
Till rising and gliding out I wander’d off by myself,
In the mystical moist night-air, and from time to time,
Look’d up in perfect silence at the stars. link
 Here Whitman is demonstrating the healing power of nature; the unity of man and nature in order to heal. One of Snyder’s poems, titled “For All”, speaks again of this unity and power. Snyder writes,
I pledge allegiance to the soil
of Turtle Island,
and to the beings who thereon dwell
one ecosystem
in diversity
under the sun
With joyful interpenetration for all.
Here Snyder is talking about how nature has the power to unite everyone; under one common sun everyone can be happy he says. It is pretty apparent that both of these men give great credit to nature and its superiority, they believe it can unite and heal, and it is the focal point of most of their poetry. There are plenty of examples of this, everywhere you turn with these poets you will find nature in all her greatness and beauty.  The connections are certainly there making it a safe bet that Snyder had Whitman in mind when writing many of these poems.

Above Pate Valley

Uncategorized 2 Comments »

Constrasting thoughts and images seem to dominate this Snyder poem, and it is no suprise that this poem is yet again about, hiking in nature.  “Above Pate Valley” is not as renoun as “Riprap”, but there are still applicable critiques and analysis’ of Snyder for this poem. It is of course always easier to think about a poem if it is right in front of you so here is the poem, “Above Pate Valley”.

 

Above Pate Valley

by Gary Snyder

 

We finished clearing the last
Section of trail by noon,
High on the ridge-side
Two thousand feet above the creek
Reached the pass, went on
Beyond the white pine groves,
Granite shoulders, to a small
Green meadow watered by the snow,
Edged with Aspen—sun
Straight high and blazing
But the air was cool.
Ate a cold fried trout in the
Trembling shadows. I spied
A glitter, and found a flake
Black volcanic glass—obsidian—
By a flower. Hands and knees
Pushing the Bear grass, thousands
Of arrowhead leavings over a
Hundred yards. Not one good
Head, just razor flakes
On a hill snowed all but summer,
A land of fat summer deer,
They came to camp. On their
Own trails. I followed my own
Trail here. Picked up the cold-drill,
Pick, singlejack, and sack
Of dynamite.
Ten thousand years.
This poem is similar to many of Snyder’s in that it is about nature, specifically hiking. But unlike “Riprap” this poem does not seem to focus as much on an overall analogy but what I noticed were the striking contrasts that Snyder gives.  For instance he has references to the blazing sun in the beginning and how it is high in the sky, yet the air is cool. He then goes on to mention cool trout and cool shadows, each of which contrast the blazing sun.  The opposite images and ideas continue in this poem after Snyder speaks of the 1000 foot tall, steep cliffs, and then procedes to search on his hands and knees for tiny pieces of obsidean.
     It may be a struggle at first because it seems as if Snyder is making nature out to be this great and powerful thing, but later there is a dissapointed tone when he cannot find the arrowheads he wants. It is interesting that he does not overplay nature in this poem like many other poets would do, he simply mentions it, but does not make it out to be all powerful. Like one blogger says about the poem,

Appreciative of ‘nature’, but he doesn’t side with nature or condemn himself either–but mostly accepts his actions or his trail–which may be what history is like but comprised of many others

This is a comment made by an anonymous blogger on a poetry blog site that can be accessed here. This is just an average person commenting on this poem but it really makes sense. Snyder does not overplay nature but just accepts it as a beautiful thing. Some different views can be taken on this poem as well.

     One critic from the university of Illinois named Todd Ensign has studied Snyder for years. He wrote an article online on ModernAmericanpoetry.com titled “Gary Snyder; a post-modern perspective”.  As you might guess this takes a look at Snyder’s post-modern analysis, including his political goals.  He is quoted writing,

Gary Snyder is one of the most passionate environmentalist-poets of the postmodern era…Snyder uses images of our environment, to re-establish our connection to the world in order to promote political change that addresses the ecological problems which face our capitalistic, image-driven culture.

The political approach to poetry is one that does not necessarily cross my mind right away but it is certainly accurate.  Snyder is a bonafide environmental activist so it only makes sense he would use strong images of the environment to cause political change.  In other words Gary Snyder wants nature preserved so he writes in order to achieve this. In this poem, he not only describes what seems to me is a breathtaking mountain pass that is thick with brush.  He then finds some obsidian rocks that may have once been arrowheads but they are too worn away to tell. At the end of the poem it simply says Ten thousand years, perhaps making a point that nature is an ancient timeline that must be preserved. So given Snyder’s background of hiking and geing a nature activist it seems fitting that he would use his poetry to try to inspire change in government to protect the environment he loves. I know that i certainly would not wish to destroy something so great and yet so delicate, something so ‘hot and cold’ and filled with contrasts. This poem is intriguing because of all of these opposites and uncertainties.  A natural timeline should not be destroyed and “Above Pate Valley” seems to convey this message pretty well, maybe it even influenced political figures over the years, who knows? A complete text of Todd Ensign’s article on Gary Snyder is available here, link.

 

 


© 2012 Gary Snyder’s fantasy factory.
WordPress Theme & Icons by N.Design Studio. Provided by WPMU DEV -The WordPress Experts   Hosted by Edublogs.org
Entries RSS Comments RSS Log in